From Manual Surveys to AI Models: The Evolution of Roadway Data Collection

Explore how AI and satellite imagery are transforming roadway data collection—moving from manual surveys to faster, scalable, and smarter infrastructure planning.

Roadway data collection has come a long way, evolving from clipboards and tape measures to satellites and artificial intelligence. City planners and transportation engineers today can access rich, up-to-date road information in real time – a stark contrast to the slow, laborious surveys of the past. 

This blog traces the journey from traditional manual methods to modern AI-driven solutions. We’ll explore the limitations of manual surveys, the rise of digital tools like GIS, and how AI and satellite imagery are revolutionizing road data collection with unprecedented automation, speed, scale, and accuracy. 

The Era of Manual Roadway Surveys

Transportation researchers in the mid-20th century gathering traffic data by hand. Before digital tools, such labor-intensive surveys were the norm for roadway data collection.

In the early days of traffic engineering, virtually all road data was gathered manually. In the 1930s, for example, highway agencies would send out staff to stand by busy roads and intersections, counting vehicles with handheld clickers or tally marks on paper. Surveyors walked roads with measuring wheels or tape to record distances and road widths, and they sketched maps by hand. Field crews carrying clipboards would inventory street signs, signals, and pavement markings one by one. These methods did provide valuable data, but only at a human scale – a few roads or intersections at a time.

By the mid-20th century, some mechanical aids emerged to assist these surveys. The 1940s saw the introduction of mechanical traffic counters (such as pneumatic road tubes) that cars could drive over, incrementing a count dial. This removed some human error from traffic counts and allowed 24/7 counts for a few days at a time. Still, even with basic automation, agencies had to statistically extrapolate short counts to estimate annual traffic, and teams of people were needed to deploy equipment and compile the results. 

In short, collecting comprehensive roadway data was meticulous and labor-intensive – requiring many person-hours and often weeks or months to complete a survey campaign for a city.

Limitations of Manual Surveys

Manual roadway surveys, while the backbone of early transportation planning, have serious limitations that modern cities struggle with:

Time-Consuming: Walking or driving every street to measure and count takes a long time. It once took months just to analyze traffic flow at a single junction; today, technology can assess an entire city in minutes. Manual pavement inspections (like PCI studies) similarly can span months or years, delaying maintenance decisions.

Costly and Labor-Intensive: Traditional surveys require large field crews and specialized vehicles, incurring high labor costs and safety risks (crews working near traffic). Sending teams repeatedly to cover thousands of road-miles is expensive.

Inconsistent and Error-Prone: Human surveyors may interpret conditions differently or make mistakes. Counts done by hand or simple devices can have significant error – for instance, road tube counters historically showed error rates around 35%, whereas newer AI methods cut that error to under 5%. Results can vary by who conducts the survey, leading to data that isn’t uniform.

Quickly Outdated: Perhaps the biggest issue is data staleness. Once a manual survey is finished, it represents a snapshot in time. City infrastructure is dynamic – new roads open, lanes change, signs come and go. Because manual surveys are so slow and costly, they might only be done once every few years, leaving cities to work with outdated maps and traffic figures. By the time a paper map or spreadsheet is compiled, development or road changes may have already made it obsolete.

In summary, manual methods gave us the first road databases and traffic counts, but they struggle to keep up with modern urban needs. Recognizing these shortcomings, the transportation world began seeking faster, more efficient tools.

Going Digital: GIS and Early Mapping Technologies

The latter half of the 20th century introduced a digital shift in roadway data collection. Government agencies and researchers started using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to store and manage road data electronically instead of on paper. By digitizing road maps and attributes, GIS allowed easier updates and analysis. 

For example, the U.S. created nationwide digital road maps (like the TIGER database in the 1980s) that planners could use on computers rather than flipping through map books. This transition meant data could be copied, shared, and analyzed much faster than before.

At the same time, new sensors began to augment road surveys. Inductive loop sensors installed in pavement could automatically count vehicles and measure speeds 24/7 at fixed locations. Early video cameras were deployed to monitor traffic, and by coupling them with rudimentary computer vision algorithms, agencies could start to get automated traffic counts or observe congestion hot spots. In the 1990s and 2000s, mobile mapping vehicles emerged: some cities equipped survey trucks with GPS, cameras, or even early LiDAR scanners to capture road information while driving. These vans could cover more ground than a walking crew and collect digital imagery or point clouds of road conditions for later analysis.

Each of these innovations improved upon the manual approach, yet they still had constraints. Inductive loops and traffic cameras only provided data at their installed locations – a city would need hundreds of them to cover every street. Mobile mapping vans captured rich data, but processing the footage or LiDAR often required manual effort (reviewing images, labeling features). 

In short, the digital and sensor era made data collection faster and continuous, but it wasn’t until the recent advent of AI that we saw a true breakthrough in scalability and automation.

How AI and Satellite Imagery Revolutionize Roadway Data Collection

The past decade has marked a turning point, as artificial intelligence and high-resolution imagery have revolutionized how we map and monitor roadways. Instead of collecting data one segment or intersection at a time, agencies can now leverage AI models to extract road information from aerial and satellite images for an entire city at once. This approach addresses the classic needs of automation, speed, scale, and accuracy:

Automation: Modern AI algorithms (computer vision and machine learning) can recognize road features in imagery automatically – no manual data entry needed. For instance, software can scan satellite photos and identify road segments, intersections, lane markings, signs, and even crosswalks without a human in the loop.

Speed: What once took months of field work can now happen in days or even hours. An AI system can analyze a new city-wide image the moment it’s available. With 2020s technology, cities can refresh their entire road network data far more frequently. In one pilot, AI mapped thousands of miles of sidewalks 45× faster than a traditional survey. 

Scale: Satellite imagery provides wide-area coverage that was previously unimaginable. A single high-resolution satellite pass can capture an entire metropolitan area’s road network in one set of images. This means planners are not limited to sample corridors – they can get data on every road, big or small. 

Accuracy and Consistency: AI doesn’t get tired or biased. It applies the same detection rules everywhere, ensuring uniform data quality. A computer vision model will identify a stop sign or a pothole using the same criteria citywide, reducing the inconsistencies that come with different surveyors in the field. Moreover, machine learning can detect subtle details (faded lane lines, small cracks) that a human might overlook.

Another key advantage is frequency of updates. Satellite constellations now image the same location daily or weekly. By continually feeding fresh imagery into AI models, cities can keep their road databases “live.” New construction, road closures, or changes in signage can be detected and updated almost in real time. This dynamic approach addresses the Achilles’ heel of manual surveys – data getting out-of-date – by ensuring a current digital twin of the roadway.

Urban SDK’s Role in the Transformation

Urban SDK has emerged as a leader in applying AI and satellite imagery to modern road data collection. The company’s platform exemplifies how the new approach overcomes manual limitations and adds new value for city planners:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M-ZPz8OTFVk9ptgN5EajCHylsvwm1BULQ9cM6-Cm1HY/edit?tab=t.0

Comprehensive Roadway Inventory via AI: Urban SDK’s Roadway Characteristics product uses satellite imagery and deep learning to extract detailed road geometry and attributes automatically. This includes 3D road geometry, lane counts, surface types (paved vs. unpaved), presence of bike lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, and more – all digitized without sending field crews to each street. Planners get a rich GIS-ready layer of their entire road network, generated in hours instead of years.

Real-Time Updates and Fewer Field Visits: Because it leverages frequently updated satellite and aerial imagery, Urban SDK enables near real-time road data. Fast-growing cities that once struggled to keep maps current can now obtain updated road maps within days of new development. Municipal clients report drastically fewer field trips because the remote sensing data captures most changes. This agility is crucial in regions where new subdivisions, road widenings, or traffic pattern changes happen rapidly.

Integrated Crash and Speed Data: A standout feature of Urban SDK’s approach is how it ties roadway data together with traffic safety and performance metrics. The platform links road characteristics with crash data, speed analytics, and congestion patterns, giving a holistic view of both the infrastructure and how it’s used. 

For example, a city can see road segments alongside their accident history and typical speeds, all in one place. This integration means planners and safety engineers can identify high-risk locations (via Urban SDK’s Collision Index) by correlating road features with crash hotspots, or find corridors where speed limits don’t match actual travel speeds. By uniting physical road data with dynamic traffic data, Urban SDK provides context that manual maps alone could never supply.

GIS-Ready and Easy to Use: Urban SDK delivers its AI-derived road data as georeferenced layers that plug directly into standard GIS and transportation planning software. Users access the information through a dashboard or API, overlaying it on their city maps. Because the data is already in a usable format, cities don’t need to perform laborious data cleaning or conversion. This “plug-and-play” readiness accelerates analysis – whether it’s feeding into traffic simulation models or public-facing smart city dashboards. In short, Urban SDK’s outputs are planning-ready.

By harnessing these capabilities, Urban SDK clients can do things like rapidly map all road assets for an asset management plan, monitor pavement conditions across the network, or conduct equity audits to see which neighborhoods lack sidewalks or safe infrastructure. For instance, the platform can automatically flag streets in underserved areas that are missing crosswalks or ADA ramps, guiding more equitable investments. This level of insight – updated continually and available on demand – represents a quantum leap from the static, patchy surveys of the past.

Conclusion

Roadway data collection has evolved from paper maps and tape measures to a high-tech ecosystem of sensors, imagery, and AI. What used to require months of manual surveying by field crews can now be done in a fraction of the time with modern technology. Manual methods, once the only option, are no longer sufficient in an age when city planners need up-to-date information at their fingertips. Digital tools like GIS and mobile mapping paved the way, and now AI models – fueled by satellites, cameras, and connected vehicles – are bringing unprecedented efficiency and insight.

Urban SDK exemplifies this evolution, showing how combining satellite imagery, AI, and integration with real-time data can turn raw information into actionable intelligence for safer and smarter city streets. Planners and public sector stakeholders can now spend less time collecting data and more time using data – to improve traffic safety, optimize infrastructure investments, and respond swiftly to changes on the ground. From manual surveys to AI models, the journey of roadway data collection reflects the broader smart city narrative: embracing innovation to better understand and serve our communities. Cities that leverage these new tools will be equipped to “own the road forward,” building more resilient and efficient transportation networks for the future.

‍